Didomi alternative
Didomi is one of the best-rated CMPs in the European market — 4.5-4.6/5 on G2 across 160+ reviews, category leader for 12 consecutive seasons, with a compliance engine that handles complex jurisdictions well. The difference with Tripticonsent isn't product quality — it's that Didomi doesn't publish pricing at any tier: its three packages (Essential, Advanced, Premium) are quoted by traffic (Monthly Unique Visitors) after a sales call.
| Didomi | Tripticonsent | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Three custom packages, quoted by traffic after a sales call | Public, per event — no sales call |
| Billing unit | Monthly Unique Visitors across the whole site | Real consent events |
| Proof of consent | A record inside their platform | Append-only vault + Ed25519 signed receipt, offline-verifiable |
| AI-agent access | No publicly documented MCP server | Production MCP server with OAuth 2.1, scoped like a teammate |
| Domains | Unlimited within the contracted package | Unlimited, quota pooled per organization |
Pricing. Didomi: no public pricing — three packages (Essential, Advanced, Premium) quoted by traffic after a sales call. Tripticonsent: free up to 1,000 events/month, then $19/mo + $0.25 per additional 1,000 events, with the price visible from day one. See full pricing.
What it does well
- 4.5-4.6/5 on G2 across 160+ reviews, category leader for 12 consecutive seasons
- A strong compliance engine for complex jurisdictions, with frequent regulatory updates
- Well-rated implementation and interface — among the CMPs with the smoothest initial setup
Real user complaints
- No public pricing on any package — all three tiers (Essential, Advanced, Premium) require a sales call
- Bills by traffic (Monthly Unique Visitors), not consent events — a traffic spike unrelated to the banner can push you into a higher tier
- Pricing opacity shows up consistently as the top complaint in independent reviews across the category
Because their model quotes by traffic (Monthly Unique Visitors) and feature package, which varies too much to publish a fixed table — the same reason most enterprise CMPs give. Tripticonsent avoids that problem by billing on an axis that doesn't move with a site's general traffic: the consent event itself.
Its multi-jurisdiction compliance engine has a strong reputation and consistent reviews on that point. Tripticonsent solves the same problem by storing rules as versioned data evaluated at request time, not in code — covering GDPR, ePrivacy, CCPA and TCF v2.2 — but if you need broader regulatory coverage already validated by a dedicated engine, that's a real point in Didomi's favor.
Migrate the consent layer, don't rewrite your banner.
The SDK speaks the same purpose/GRANTED-DENIED state model you already use. Integration is one API call.